Not known Factual Statements About how cases are handled that are not mentioned in law
Not known Factual Statements About how cases are handled that are not mentioned in law
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
A survey of PACER customers, conducted in 2021, measured consumer satisfaction and discovered areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office from the U.S. Courts is using the survey results To judge and prioritize long term changes to PACER services and characteristics.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are from the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case with the petitioners for promotion could be viewed as, however, we have been obvious within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy issue into the approval from the competent authority.
The explained recovery may be used, within the most, for corroboration of your main evidence, but by itself it cannot be considered a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of prevalence. The said memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as nothing was discovered as a result of these kinds of pointation. The place of event plus the place of throwing the dead body were already during the knowledge of witnesses ahead of their pointation with the petitioners. Reliance is usually placed on case regulation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified by the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Petitioner getting been declared an absconder in this case for over one particular along with a fifty percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may well avoid standing trial and as a result delay the prosecution from the case. The material on record makes the case of the petitioner falls under two exceptions to the rule of grant of bail as mentioned previously mentioned.
The Court deemed the case for being maintainable under Article 184 (three) Because the Risk and encroachment alleged were including to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe to be a foster child. Even though the few had two youthful children of their individual at home, the social worker didn't inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement inside the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair had younger children.
The law of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only finished If your employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence plus the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
10. Without touching the merits from the case on the issue of yearly increases during the pensionary emoluments of your petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, such yearly increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to become made by the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
It also addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and a hundred and twenty on the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the here appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.